The highest reported History Optional scores in UPSC Mains, the rank-holders who wrote History, what their Paper I and Paper II splits reveal, and the seven answer habits that separate a 300+ score from the 250 most candidates get stuck at, shown on a real PYQ.
Quick Answer
- Highest reported History Optional score: 316 / 500, Ishwar Kumar Kandoo (AIR 187, CSE 2017). This is the figure most often cited as the recent-pattern record.
- Recent 300+ scores: Nausheen, 308 (AIR 9, CSE 2023; 166 + 142); Shruti Sharma, 306 (AIR 1, CSE 2021; 150 + 156).
- CSE 2025: Samiksha Dwivedi, 299 (AIR 56), reported as the highest History score of that year.
- The typical selected range in publicly shared marksheets sits around 260–290. Candidates repeatedly describe being “stuck at 250”.
- The pattern in the splits: in six of the seven publicly reported Paper I / Paper II splits we compiled, Paper I scored higher, by 15 marks on average. Paper II is where most History candidates leave marks behind.
What the high scorers share is not rarer knowledge. It is seven habits of answer-writing (Section 4): a framed introduction, visible structure, precise evidence, named historians, maps and flowcharts, a real verdict, and complete attempts inside the time limit. Every one of them can be trained on past questions. The History Optional PYQ Master Pack writes its model answers to these habits.
Highest History Optional marks in UPSC
UPSC doesn’t publish subject-wise toppers. Every “highest marks” claim you see comes from candidates’ own marksheets, shared after results. The list below includes only figures that have been reported consistently.
Highest publicly reported History Optional scores (500-mark pattern)
| Score | Candidate | Rank | Exam | Paper I | Paper II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 316 | Ishwar Kumar Kandoo | AIR 187 | CSE 2017 | — | — |
| 308 | Nausheen | AIR 9 | CSE 2023 | 166 | 142 |
| 306 | Shruti Sharma | AIR 1 | CSE 2021 | 150 | 156 |
| 299 | Samiksha Dwivedi | AIR 56 | CSE 2025 | — | — |
| 288 | Abhiznan Hazarika | AIR 172 | CSE 2023 | 154 | 134 |
| 280 | Roshan Kachhawa | AIR 620 | CSE 2022 | 149 | 131 |
| 279 | Siddharth Shukla | AIR 18 | CSE 2022 | 154 | 125 |
What the table shows:
- 300 is achievable in History, but rare. A handful of scores above 300 have been reported in the current pattern. Compared with other large optionals, History’s ceiling is competitive; its average is not.
- A top rank doesn’t need a record optional score. Siddharth Shukla’s 279 came with AIR 18. Optional marks matter, but they sit inside a 2,025-mark total.
- The gap between 250 and 300 is about 25 marks per paper, roughly 2–3 marks on each of the ten or so sub-answers in a paper. That’s a difference in answer craft, not knowledge.
What is a “good” History Optional score?
| Band (out of 500) | What it usually means |
|---|---|
| 300+ | Exceptional. Top-decile craft across both papers, including Paper II |
| 280–299 | Strong. Competitive for a good rank with solid GS and Essay |
| 260–279 | Safe range among selected candidates in shared marksheets |
| 240–259 | The “stuck” band. Content is present, but answers describe rather than argue |
| Below 240 | Usually incomplete attempts, a weak map score, or a thin Paper II Section B |
These bands come from publicly shared marksheets, not official statistics. Treat them as a guide.
History Optional toppers list
Rank-holders in recent cycles who wrote History as their optional:
| Exam | Rank | Name | History score (where publicly reported) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSE 2025 | AIR 44 | Deeksha | — |
| CSE 2025 | AIR 56 | Samiksha Dwivedi | 299 |
| CSE 2024 | AIR 43 | Avdhija Gupta | — |
| CSE 2024 | AIR 66 | Simran | — |
| CSE 2024 | AIR 202 | Ashish Raghuwanshi | — |
| CSE 2023 | AIR 9 | Nausheen | 308 |
| CSE 2023 | AIR 172 | Abhiznan Hazarika | 288 |
| CSE 2022 | AIR 18 | Siddharth Shukla | 279 |
| CSE 2021 | AIR 1 | Shruti Sharma | 306 |
| CSE 2017 | AIR 187 | Ishwar Kumar Kandoo | 316 |
Two things are worth noticing. History keeps producing top-100 ranks every year, which is hard to square with its reputation as a declining optional. And UPSC’s published success rate for History (4.9% across CSE 2020–22, the lowest of the large optionals) shows that the average History candidate is not writing like these candidates. The distance between the two is the subject of the rest of this article.
For all-subject topper marks, see UPSC Toppers Marks.
What the Paper I vs Paper II split tells you
Of the seven candidates above whose paper-wise split has been shared publicly (including two lower-ranked selected candidates from CSE 2022 not shown in the table):
| Candidate | Paper I | Paper II | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nausheen (AIR 9, 2023) | 166 | 142 | +24 |
| Abhiznan Hazarika (AIR 172, 2023) | 154 | 134 | +20 |
| Siddharth Shukla (AIR 18, 2022) | 154 | 125 | +29 |
| Roshan Kachhawa (AIR 620, 2022) | 149 | 131 | +18 |
| Herrsh Sharma (AIR 194, 2022) | 134 | 125 | +9 |
| Amar Meena (AIR 830, 2022) | 127 | 115 | +12 |
| Shruti Sharma (AIR 1, 2021) | 150 | 156 | −6 |
In six of seven splits, Paper I outscored Paper II, by an average of about 15 marks. Seven marksheets are a small sample, so treat this as a pattern worth testing, not a law. But it fits what the PYQs show:
- Paper I has a 50-mark map question that rewards steady drilling more than insight, arguably the most learnable 50 marks in the optional. Paper II has no equivalent.
- Paper II’s Section B (World History) is under-prepared by many candidates who treat it as a “second half”. It carries half of Paper II’s questions: 196 of 393 topic-tagged questions from 2013 to 2026.
- Paper II questions are more often quotation-led. Since 2013 about 41–42% of Paper II questions open with a quotation to be judged, against 15–21% in Paper I. Quotation questions punish narration and reward a verdict.
The notable exception is Shruti Sharma, whose Paper II (156) beat her Paper I. The top score of that year came with a Paper II above 150.
Practical implication: if your mock scores stall around 250, look at Paper II first, and Section B in particular. That is where the next 20 marks usually are.
Seven habits of high-scoring History answers
These habits come from what the paper demands, visible in 42 years of questions, and from what candidates who cleared Mains report doing. Check them against any topper copy you read. They hold across ancient, medieval, modern and world history.
Habit 1: The introduction frames the claim; it doesn’t narrate background
The first two or three lines state what the question is really asking and which way the answer will go. With about 190 quotation-led questions since 2013 (roughly one in four), an introduction that restates the quotation’s claim and signals a position earns attention immediately.
Habit 2: The structure is visible in ten seconds
Sub-headings or numbered blocks, one idea each. Examiners mark hundreds of scripts. An answer whose argument is visible at a glance gets read generously.
Habit 3: Evidence is precise
Not “Ashoka spread dhamma” but Rock Edict XIII. Not “the British drained wealth” but Naoroji’s estimate and the Home Charges. Aim for four or more specific items per 15–20-mark answer: a date, a text, an inscription, a statistic, an act, a site.
Habit 4: Historians are named, correctly and briefly
One named reading in a 10-marker, two in a debate question. “R.S. Sharma reads the post-Gupta land grants as feudalisation; B.D. Chattopadhyaya reads them as integrative state formation.” Naming is not showing off. It shows the examiner you know the question is contested. See How to Cite Historians.
Habit 5: Maps, flowcharts and timelines
A candidate who cleared Mains 2025 with History described their approach on r/UPSC as “usage of maps (heavy), some basic flowcharts and diagrams”. A sketch map of Mauryan edicts, Maratha expansion or the partition of Africa takes 90 seconds and communicates more than a paragraph. It works in Paper II too.
Habit 6: A real verdict
“Thus, both views have merit” is not a conclusion. High-scoring answers commit: largely, only in part, in the short run but not the long. The question asked you to judge, so judge.
Habit 7: Complete attempts inside the time limit
Five questions, fifteen or so sub-answers, three hours. An unwritten 15-marker costs more than any stylistic flaw. Top scorers practise to 11 minutes per 15-marker, 14 per 20-marker and 7 per 10-marker, and they don’t overrun.
The habits as a checklist
| # | Habit | Quick test on your answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Framed intro | Do lines 1–3 state the claim and your line? |
| 2 | Visible structure | Can someone see your argument in 10 seconds? |
| 3 | Precise evidence | Are there 4+ specific items? |
| 4 | Historians named | Is at least one reading attributed by name? |
| 5 | Visual | Would a map or flowchart help here, and is it there? |
| 6 | Verdict | Does the conclusion take a position? |
| 7 | Timed and complete | Did you finish within the time box? |
Average vs topper-style: the same PYQ, answered twice
Question (Paper II, 2026, 20 marks): “The conquests of Napoleon were ephemeral but his civilian work was built on granite.” Explain.
The average answer (scores about 10–11)
Napoleon Bonaparte rose to power after the French Revolution and became Emperor in 1804. He conquered much of Europe, defeating Austria, Prussia and Russia at various battles such as Austerlitz and Jena. He introduced the Continental System against Britain. However, his invasion of Russia in 1812 failed and he was defeated at Leipzig and finally at Waterloo in 1815. The Congress of Vienna redrew the map of Europe.
Napoleon also made many reforms. He introduced the Napoleonic Code, made a Concordat with the Pope, set up the Bank of France and reformed education. These reforms lasted a long time.
Thus Napoleon’s conquests did not last but his reforms did.
Nothing here is wrong. But it narrates, it gives the reforms a single sentence, it names no historian, and its conclusion only repeats the question.
The topper-style answer (built to score 14+)
Introduction: Napoleon himself spoke of setting “masses of granite” in the soil of France: durable institutions to anchor post-revolutionary society. The quotation contrasts the collapse of his territorial empire by 1815 with the survival of those institutions. The contrast largely holds, with two qualifications.
1. Why the conquests were ephemeral
- Overextension: the Continental System (Berlin Decree, 1806) required policing an entire coastline; enforcing it drew him into Iberia (the Peninsular War) and Russia (1812).
- Nationalism turned against him: Spanish guerrillas, the Prussian reform movement and the German “war of liberation” (1813) used the Revolution’s own idea of the nation.
- Dynastic, not institutional, control: satellite kingdoms under relatives (Joseph in Spain, Louis in Holland) had no roots.
- Outcome: Leipzig (1813), Waterloo (1815); Vienna restored the dynasties on the principles of legitimacy and compensation.
2. Why the civilian work endured
- Civil Code (1804): legal equality, property rights, secular civil marriage. Retained in France, and in Belgium, the Rhineland and parts of Italy after 1815.
- Administrative centralisation: prefects (1800) and a salaried bureaucracy, a model that outlasted every later regime.
- Concordat (1801): settled church–state conflict for a century.
- Bank of France (1800), lycées (1802), Legion of Honour (1802): merit and fiscal order institutionalised.
3. Qualifications
- The “granite” was conservative too: the Code subordinated women and workers (the livret); Isser Woloch stresses that the new regime consolidated a propertied order.
- The conquests weren’t wholly ephemeral: by exporting the Code and dissolving the Holy Roman Empire (1806), they cleared the ground for Italian and German unification.
Historians: Georges Lefebvre saw Napoleon as consolidator of the bourgeois gains of 1789; Pieter Geyl‘s Napoleon: For and Against shows how every generation re-judged him; Martyn Lyons emphasises the Revolution’s legacy institutionalised.
Conclusion: The statement is largely valid. Military rule over Europe collapsed within a decade, while the Code, the prefects and the Concordat outlived the Bourbons, the Orleanists and the Second Empire. It needs qualifying, though: the conquests left a lasting political legacy through nationalism and the Code’s export, and the “granite” preserved hierarchy as well as revolutionary equality.
[A small sketch map of the Napoleonic Empire at its height, 1812, with satellite states shaded: 90 seconds.]
Count the habits: framed introduction (1), three visible blocks (2), a dozen dated specifics (3), three named historians (4), a map (5), a qualified verdict (6), and it fits in about 300 words, written in 14 minutes (7). The facts barely differ from the average answer. What differs is how the answer uses them.
How to use topper answer copies properly
Topper copies are among the most useful free resources in this optional, and among the most misused.
Do:
- Read a copy after attempting the same question yourself. Compare structure first, content second.
- Note how often they use maps and flowcharts, and in which kinds of question.
- Note how many historians they cite per answer. It’s usually fewer than people think: one or two, used precisely.
- Look at their Paper II Section B answers specifically. That is where most candidates are weakest.
Don’t:
- Memorise topper answers. Next year’s question will frame the topic differently.
- Copy their handwriting habits or length. Your time box depends on your speed.
- Assume every answer in a topper copy scored well. The marks are per question, and even toppers have weak answers.
- Judge by one copy. Read three or four and look for the habits they share.
Training the habits on PYQs
Toppers didn’t develop these habits by reading more. They practised them on real questions until they became automatic. The simplest way to do the same:
- Pick a clause and its last ten PYQs from the topic-wise archive.
- Write one answer under time.
- Score it against the seven-habit checklist above.
- Compare it with a model answer built on the same habits, and note what it did that you didn’t.
- Repeat the loop, at least twice a day, for three months.
This is where the History Optional PYQ Master Pack comes in. It gives you topic-wise model answers to History Optional PYQs from 1985 to 2025, arranged by syllabus clause, with map-section solutions for the 50-mark question, all written to the seven habits in this article. Use it in step 4: attempt first, compare second. That way you learn what a 300-standard answer does, not just what it says.
→ See the History Optional PYQ Master Pack
Resources
| Resource | Use it for | Link |
|---|---|---|
| UPSC Toppers Marks | All-subject topper marksheets | Open |
| Why Answers Score 10–13, Not 16–18 | The gap between average and topper answers | Open |
| How to Cite Historians | Habit 4, clause by clause | Open |
| Map Section Guide | The 50 marks that lift Paper I | Open |
| Is History Optional Still Scoring? | Marks trends and success rates | Open |
| 2026 Question Paper | The Napoleon question above, and the rest of the paper | Open |
| History Optional PYQ Master Pack | Model answers written to the seven habits | Open |
Frequently Asked Questions
In one paragraph
History’s recorded ceiling is above 300 out of 500: 316 in CSE 2017, 308 in 2023, 306 for the AIR 1 of 2021. Most selected candidates score between 260 and 290, and many aspirants stall around 250. The toppers didn’t know rarer facts. They wrote with seven habits: a framed introduction, visible structure, precise evidence, named historians, maps and flowcharts, a real verdict, and complete attempts on time. And they usually won or lost the decisive marks in Paper II. Every one of those habits can be trained on past questions against model answers built to the same standard.


