Society in Vijayanagara Empire

Social life under the Vijayanagara Empire was highly developed and richly documented. Foreign travellers such as Nuniz, Paes, Nicolò Conti, and Barbosa left vivid accounts of the splendour of its buildings and the luxurious social life of the city of Vijayanagara.

Royal Court

  • The king and his courtiers led an extravagant and luxurious life, standing in sharp contrast to the modest living standards of the common man, who bore the burden of taxation.
  • The royal palace maintained a large establishment that included a considerable number of women, specially chosen for their youth and beauty — some brought from abroad, others captured and enslaved in war.
    • Many of these women were courtesans, skilled in music and dance, while others served as concubines of princes, nobles, and courtiers.
  • Paes describes the beautiful houses of the wealthy and their large retinues of household servants, while Nicolò Conti refers to the prevalence of slavery in the empire.

Caste System

  • The institution of caste, with all its social and economic implications, was a universally accepted form of social organisation.
  • The poet Allasani Peddana, in his celebrated work Manucharitramu, mentions the four castes that existed in Vijayanagara society: Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras.

Position of Different Castes in Society

  • Brahmins occupied a highly respected position in civil life. With the exception of a few who entered state service, most devoted themselves to religious and literary pursuits.
    • Nuniz describes them as “honest men, given to merchandise, very acute and of much talent, very good at accounts, lean men and well formed but little fitted for hard work.”
    • Domingo Paes notes that Brahmins were vegetarians, and that their womenfolk were known for their beauty and seclusion.
  • Kshatriyas were generally associated with the ruling dynasties, assisting them in matters of state and warfare; most nobles and men of rank belonged to this caste.
  • Vaishyas were essentially the merchant class, engaged in trade and commercial activity.
    • These upper castes enjoyed the privileges attached to their social status — they were economically well placed, commanded royal favour, and had access to education.
  • Shudras were considered inferior in status and performed manual labour to earn their livelihood. Both in towns and villages, castes tended to live in separate quarters, following their own distinct customs and habits.
  • The outcastes, who tilled the land and performed menial work, lived in hamlets set apart at a distance from the main village.

Position of Women in Society

  • Women played an important role in the social life of the Vijayanagara Empire. Although their overall position had not markedly improved, some women were highly learned and accomplished.
    • They received training not only in literature and fine arts such as music, but also in wrestling, and were employed as astrologers, keepers of accounts, and even judges.
    • Princesses of the royal family generally received a good education in literature and the fine arts. Gangadevi, wife of Kampana, authored the celebrated work Maduravijayam, while Tirumalamba was a distinguished Sanskrit poetess during the reign of Achyuta Raya.
  • According to Nuniz, large numbers of women were employed in the palace as dancers, domestic servants, and palanquin (palki) bearers.
  • The custom of devadasis — dancing girls attached to temples — was in vogue, as recorded by Paes; they were also summoned to perform at festivities held in the royal palace.
  • Polygamy was a recognised and accepted practice among the wealthy, and child marriage was similarly common.
  • Nuniz records that the practice of sati was also in vogue, while polygamy was especially prevalent among royal families.

Amusements

  • People relaxed from the demands of daily life through hunting, gambling, playing games such as polo, and watching theatrical performances and cock fights.
  • Paes records that every morning, before daylight, Krishna Deva Raya would drink gingelly oil and exercise with earthenware weights and a sword, then wrestle with one of his wrestlers before riding out and taking his morning bath.
  • Dedicated areas within the royal palace at Vijayanagara were set aside for the amusement of the monarch and his court, where animal fights and wrestling matches — including bouts involving women wrestlers — were staged.
  • Festivals and fairs also served as important sources of amusement for the general population.

Dress and Food Habits

  • Silk and cotton were the principal materials used for clothing, while perfumes, flowers, and ornaments were widely used by the people.
  • Both the king and the general public were meat-eaters, consuming the flesh of most animals except oxen or cows; animal sacrifices were common. Certain sections of the population — Brahmins, Jains, and Saivas — remained strict vegetarians.

Religion

  • The early Vijayanagara rulers of the Sangama dynasty were predominantly Saivites, with Virupaksha as their family deity. Later dynasties came increasingly under the influence of Vaishnava saints, and the Srivaishnavism of Ramanuja gained wide popularity.
    • The Vaishnava text Prapannamritam gives a legendary account of the conversion of the Vijayanagara king Virupaksha to Vaishnavism. Krishna Deva Raya himself was devoted to both Vishnu and Shiva.
    • Sadasiva Raya followed a liberal religious policy, worshipping Shiva, Vishnu, and Ganesha alike. A large number of temples were built during this period, and numerous festivals were celebrated.
  • All Vijayanagara kings displayed marked religious tolerance. Besides the Vedic religion, other sects such as the Jains also enjoyed royal protection and patronage.
  • Muslims were employed in the administration and were freely permitted to build mosques and practise their faith. Barbosa, who visited the court of Krishna Deva Raya, observed: “The king allows such freedom that every man may come and go and live according to his own creed without suffering any annoyance and without enquiries whether he is a Christian, Jew, Moor or Hindu.”

During the Vijaynagar period, the nayaka and ayagar systems came into prominence but local institutions of the earlier period (sabha, nadu and ur) institutions did not completely disappear. 

The Nayankara System: 

  • The nayankara system was an important characteristic of the Vijaynagar political organisation. 
  • The military chiefs or warriors held the title of nayaka or amaranayaka. It is difficult to classify these warriors on the basis of definite office, ethnic identity, set of duties or rights and privileges. 

Inscriptional descriptions

  • Epigraphical records speak of different kinds of nayakas such as dannayakas (military official), durga dannayakas (military official in charge of fort), amaranayakas. It seems there was some hierarchical relation among them. 
  • Landholding allocated to nayakas was called nayakattam. 
  • Karashima and Subbarayalu have studied the Tamil epigraphical sources of the Vijayanagara period and they have presented description of nayakas and the institution of nayakattam.
    • More than three hundred nayakas in the northern part of Tamil region which consisted of five rajyas. This number is attributed to post 1485 period. 
    • All these Nayakas were in possession of nayakattanam. They controlled production in their nayakattanam territories by encouraging settlers including cultivators, artisans and other groups who on their part enjoyed soome tax concession. 
    • They were obliged to be present in the royal headquarters and therefore they looked after their territory through their agents or Karyakarta.
  • In return to the territory received from the king the nayaks had to maintain troops ready to be sent the battle field and also the sent a portion of the revenue from their territory to their superior.
  • Krishnaswami: Based on the study of inscription of the Vijayanagar period upto 1530 he concluded that there were large number of nayakas in the Tamil country. These inscriptions belong to category of gifts to temples, refer to building of tanks etc. collection of taxes from temples.
    • Krishnaswami considers the nayaka system as feudal.
  • D.C. Sircar: on the basis of his study of inscriptions analyses the amaram tenure.
    • Refutes the feudal theory; instead he explains it as a kind of landlordism, a variant of feudalism in which land was allouted to the amaranayakas for military services rendered by them to the king.
  • The Vijaynagar inscriptions and the later Mackenzie manuscripts refer to the nayakas as territorial magnates with political aspirations which at times conflicted with the aim of the rulers.

Accounts of European travelers: 

  • The institution of nayaka was studied in detail by two Portuguese-Fernao Nuniz and Domingo Paes, who visited India during the reigns of Krishnadeva Raya and Achyut Raya of Tuluva dynasty during the sixteenth century.
    • They regard the nayakas simply as agents of Rayas (central government).
      • Domingo Paes has stated that:
        • These nayakas always maintained troops ready for duty as it can be called out by the king. And each of these nayakas labours to turn out the best troops he can get because he pays them their salary. 
        • Beside maintaining these troops each nayakas had to make his annual payments to the king and the king has his own salaried troops to whom he gives payments. 
    • The evidence of Nuniz for the payments made by the nayakas to the Rayas brings up the question of feudal obligations. His chronicles states that:
      • There were two hundred nayakas in the vijayanagara empire. 
      • “All the land belongs to the kings and from his hand the captains held it, they make it over the husbandmen who pays nine tenths to their lord; and they have no land of their own for the kingdom belong entirely to the king.”

The Ayagar System: 

  • The term ayagar is only rarely found in Kannada inscription as noted by subbarayalu and it is not found in Tamil inscriptions. Inscriptional evidence has not been found to support the view that this ‘system’ was introduced during vijayanagara period. 
  • During the Vijaynagar period, autonomous local institutions, especially in the Tamil country, suffered a set-back. In pre-Vijaynagar days in Karnataka and Andhra local institutions possessed lesser autonomy as compared to Tamil country. It spread from karnataka to the Tamil country and became widely prevalent during 15-16th century as a result of the declining power of nadu and nattar
  • The ayagars were village servants or functionaries and constituted of groups of families. These were headmen (reddi or gauda, maniyam), accountant (karnam senabhova) and watchmen (talaiyari).
    • They were given a portion of or plot in a village. Sometimes they had to pay a fixed rent, but generally these plots were manya or tax-free as no regular customary tax was imposed on their agricultural income. 
    • In exceptional cases, direct payments in kind were made for services performed by village functionaries. 
  • The distinguishing feature of the ayagar system is that special allocation of income from land and specific cash payments were for the first time provided to village servants holding a particular office.

Ritual Kingship: 

  • It is generally emphasised that the principle of strict adherence to dharma was the chief constituent and distinguishing feature of the Vijaynagara state. But:
    • Very often it was the Hindu rulers against whom the Vijaynagara rulers had to fight, e.g. the Gajapatis of Orissa. 
    • The most strategically placed contingents of the Vijaynagar army were under the charge of Muslim commanders. 
    • The Muslim archers were employed by King Deva Raya II. These Muslim contingents played an important role in the victory of Vijaynagara against its Hindu rivals. 
  • The successful military deeds of the Vijaynagara rulers led them to assume the title of digvijayans. Vijaynagara kingship was symbolic in the sense that the Vijaynagara rulers exercised their control through their overlords over a region beyond the prime centre of their authority:
    • This symbolism was manifested through the instrument of religion which was used to ensure loyalty from the people. For example, ritual kingship is best exemplified in the Mahanavami festival.
      • This was an annual royal ceremony lasting for nine days between 15 September and 15 October. It culminated in the Dusahra festival on the tenth day. 
      • Important personages (e.g., military commanders) from the peripheral parts participated in the festival. Through this festival, recognition of the sovereignty of Vijaynagar rulers by peripheral parts of the empire was strengthened. 
      • Though the Brahmans participated in the festival, their role was not predominant. The ritual rites of the festival were largely performed by the king himself. 

Political Role of the Brahmans

  • A distinct feature of the Vijaynagar state was the importance of the Brahmans as political and secular personnel rather than ritual leaders.
    • Most of the durga dannaiks (incharge of forts) were Brahmans. 
    • Literary sources substantiate the theory that fortresses were significant during this period and were placed under the control of the Brahmans, especially of Telugu origins. 
  • During this period, the majority of educated Brahmans desired to become government servants as administrators and accountants which offered them good career prospects.
    • The Imperial Secretariat was totally manned by the Brahmans. 
  • These Brahmans were different from the other Brahmans: they belonged to a sub-caste called the Telugu niyogis. They were not very orthodox in performing religious rites. 
  • They also worked as potential legitimizers. The Brahman Vidyaranya and his kinsmen were the ministers of the Sangama brothers: they provided legitimacy to their rule by accepting them back into the Hindu fold. 
  • The Brahmans also played an important role as military commanders in the Vijaynagar army. For example, under Krishnadeva Raya Brahman Timma received economic support as he was an integral part of the political system.
    • Thus Brahmans constructed and commanded fortresses in different parts of the empire for which they were assigned revenue of some crown villages, bhandaravada. 
    • Differentiation was made between crown villages and amaram villages (whose income was under the charge of the local military chiefs). 

Relationship between Kings, Sects and Temples: 

  • To establish effective control over the distant Tamil region, the Vijaynagar ruler. sought the help of the Vaishnava sectarian leaders who hailed from the Tamil country.
    • For legitimizing their power in this region, it was necessary for the rulers, who were aliens in the Tamil region, to establish contacts with the basic Tamil religious organisation – the temples. 
  • The relationship between kings, sects and temples can be explained in terms of four assertions:
    • Temples were basic for sustaining kingship.
    • Sectarian leaders were the connecting links between kings and temples. 
    • Though the routine supervision of the temples was done by local sectarian groups, the task of solving disputes concerning temples was in the hands of the king. 
    • The intervention of the king in the above matter was administrative, not legislative. 
  • During 1350-1650, numerous temples sprang up in south India. Through grants or gifts to the temples in the form of material resources (a part of the agricultural produce of specified villages), a particular type of agrarian economy evolved under the Vijaynagar rule.
    • The rulers of the early Sangama dynasty were Saivas who made additions to the Sri Virupaksha(Pampati) temple of Vijaynagar. 
    • The Saluvas were basically Vaishnavas who gave patronage to both the Siva and Vishnu temples. 
    • Krishnadeva Raya (the Tuluva‘ruler) constructed the Krishnaswami temple (Vaishnava shrine) and also gave grants to Siva temples. 
    • The Aravidu kings also gave gifts to Vaishnava temples. 

History Optional Courses

guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted