Elaborate the salient features and the role of middle class in India’s democracy and development.

Elaborate the salient features and the role of middle class in India’s democracy and development. (2023)

India’s middle class is an anomaly: it was manufactured by a colonial state rather than thrown up by industry. B. B. Mishra held that it arose from changes in law and public administration rather than from economic development — an origin that still explains its institutional power and political detachment.

Salient features

  • Born of the state, not the market. Its base is government service, the professions and the university, not capital. Max Weber’s market situation — credentials that command a price — describes it better than Karl Marx’s ownership criterion.
  • Education, not income, is the entry ticket. AISHE 2023-24 records a higher-education Gross Enrolment Ratio of 30.0 with 4.50 crore students — the pipeline that reproduces the class.
  • Internally plural. An old salaried, state-dependent segment; a mercantile petty bourgeoisie; a post-Green Revolution rural middle class, regional rather than national in outlook; and a Dalit and OBC middle class made by reservation — Scheduled Caste enrolment ratio has risen from 18.9 in 2014-15 to 27.8.
  • An upper-caste core that presents itself as casteless. Satish Deshpande argues it is numerically small but ideologically enormous, standing proxy for the nation while recoding caste advantage as merit.
  • Culturally dominant, fiscally narrow. PRICE puts 31% of Indians in middle-class households in 2020-21, projected at 47% by 2030-31; yet only 7.8 crore income tax returns were filed for AY 2026-27.

Role in India’s democracy

  • It authored the republic. The Indian National Congress in its formative decades was dominated by lawyers, journalists and educationists, and Pavan K. Varma notes this English-educated elite opposed British rule in the name of the bourgeois democracy Britain itself represented.
  • It operates constitutional democracy daily. Bureaucracy, judiciary, election machinery, press and universities are staffed by salaried professionals: the institutions that check power are middle-class workplaces.
  • It innovates in rights activism. Public interest litigation, the campaign for the Right to Information Act, 2005, NGO advocacy and the 2011 anti-corruption mobilisation were middle-class in leadership and reach. It sets the agenda because it produces and consumes the news.
  • Yet it is democracy’s least participant stratum. Turnout does not rise with class — Lokniti-CSDS 2019 data show about 66% among the poor against 70% among the middle — and the Election Commission found in April 2024 that 17 of the 50 lowest-turnout seats of 2019 were metropolitan, Hyderabad polling 44.84% against a national 67.40%. It exercises voice without votes. Christophe Jaffrelot’s silent revolution is the reminder that democracy deepened from below, through lower-caste mobilisation.

Role in development

  • Human capital and the technical establishment. The planning apparatus, the IITs and the atomic energy and space programmes were built by a scientific-professional stratum; its agricultural scientists delivered the Green Revolution.
  • The knowledge export economy. The technology sector earned $282.6 billion in FY2025, $224.4 billion of it exports, employing 5.8 million. Skilled emigration returns as remittances — $129 billion in 2024, the world’s largest inflow.
  • Demand and revenue. Urban monthly per capita expenditure of Rs 6,996 (HCES 2023-24) anchors a consumption-led market.

The critique

Leela Fernandes (India’s New Middle Class, 2006) names the politics of forgetting: the erasure of the urban poor from the city’s plans and self-image. Varma indicts its declining social responsibility once liberalisation made consumption possible; the anti-reservation agitations of 1990-91 showed it defending a monopoly over state employment in the language of merit. André Béteille (Caste, Class and Power, 1965) showed caste, class and power dissociating — a dissociation this class is slowest to admit in itself.

Conclusion

The middle class is at once constitutional democracy’s chief institutional carrier and its most insulated constituency: indispensable to how India is governed and developed, least accountable to those it speaks for.