Geography Optional 300+ Score Pack · Model answer
Carbon trading is often promoted as a market-based solution to climate change, but critics argue that it is against the principle of environmental justice. Do you agree with this assessment? Justify your response.
Carbon trading, as currently designed and implemented, offers genuine efficiencies in emissions reduction but simultaneously reproduces and entrenches existing geographical inequalities — between developed and developing nations, between corporations and communities, and between fossil carbon and biotic carbon. The argument is not binary. Carbon markets are neither wholly beneficial nor wholly unjust; they are contradictory instruments whose justice credentials depend entirely…
You are reading the opening of the model answer. The full answer is part of the Geography Optional 300+ Score Pack.
What the full answer covers
- What is Carbon Trading? Definition, Mechanism, and Spatial Logic
- Six Arguments Favouring Carbon Markets
- 1. Cost-Effective Emission Reductions Across Space
- 2. Alignment with Paris Agreement Goals (Article 6 and ITMOs)
- 3. Forest Conservation and the REDD+ Logic
- 4. Mobilizing Private Capital for Climate Action
- …and 21 more sections, with a conclusion
Unlock this answer and 800+ more
- 820 solved PYQ model answers (2013–2026), Paper I and Paper II
- Topic-wise across all 20 syllabus units
- 20 PYQ Pattern Analysis & Strategy reports, one per unit
- Diagrams and maps drawn inside the answers, where you would draw them
- 500 days of access from the day you enrol, on phone, laptop or tablet
₹1,770₹2,50029% off
Get Geography Optional 300+ Score Pack @ ₹1,770 →
One-time payment · No subscription · Instant access · UPI, cards, RuPay
See every Environmental Geography question (88 solved) →Already enrolled? Log in
