Present a sociological review on the ‘new middle class’.

“Present a sociological review on the ‘new middle class’.” (2019)

The old middle class consisted of independent proprietors: shopkeepers, farmers and small entrepreneurs. The new middle class consists of salaried, credentialled employees in bureaucracies, corporations and services. The debate turns on whether it is a distinct class, a proletarianising stratum or mainly a cultural identity.

Western theorisations

  • C. Wright Mills (White Collar, 1951): white-collar employees are propertyless, dependent on large organisations and politically passive, and they sell their personalities as well as their skills.
  • David Lockwood (The Blackcoated Worker, 1958) separated clerks’ market, work and status situations, which kept them apart from manual workers.
  • Harry Braverman (Labor and Monopoly Capital, 1974) argued that routine white-collar work is deskilled and proletarianised.
  • John H. Goldthorpe identified a service class of professionals and managers who are trusted by employers. Barbara Ehrenreich and John Ehrenreich (1977) called it a professional-managerial class.
  • Pierre Bourdieu: its power rests on cultural capital (education and taste) rather than property.

The Indian new middle class

  • Origins: B. B. Misra (The Indian Middle Classes, 1961) traced the colonial, English-educated professional class. Its post-1947 successor was salaried and dependent on the state.
  • Post-1991 “newness”: Leela Fernandes (India’s New Middle Class, 2006) argues that its newness lies in a consumerist, liberalisation-friendly identity constructed in politics and media, not in a changed social base. Pavan K. Varma (The Great Indian Middle Class, 1998) criticised its retreat from Nehruvian social responsibility.
  • Caste composition: D. L. Sheth (1999) showed lower castes entering the middle class as caste loses its ritual hierarchy. Satish Deshpande (2003; 2013) shows that its upper layers remain upper-caste and present inherited advantage as “casteless” merit.
  • Size: the ICE 360° surveys (2020–21) put the middle class, defined as households earning ₹5–30 lakh a year, at about 31% of the population.

Critical issues

  • Precarity: only 23.6% of workers held regular salaried jobs in 2025 (PLFS). Much “middle-class” work is now contractual or platform-based. NITI Aayog (2022) estimated 7.7 million gig workers in 2020–21, projected to reach 23.5 million by 2029–30. The Code on Social Security, in force since November 2025, recognises them.
  • Politics: the middle class is associated with anti-corruption activism, gated communities and scepticism of the state, alongside dependence on reservations and public-sector employment for its Dalit and OBC segments.
  • Gender: women’s entry into professions coexists with a persistent double burden of housework.

Conclusion

The new middle class is best understood as a heterogeneous, credential-based stratum held together more by consumption and aspiration than by shared market position. Its growth signals mobility, but its internal caste hierarchy and precarity show that newness has not meant openness.