Rajput Policy of Akbar

Akbar was the first Mughal emperor to pursue a planned and systematic policy towards the Rajputs. The formation of this Rajput policy of Akbar was shaped by a combination of political calculation, personal temperament, and strategic necessity, making it one of the most significant and widely examined themes in the study of Mughal consolidation for UPSC History Optional aspirants.

Factors Behind Akbar’s Rajput Policy

  • Exploiting Rajput rivalries: The contemporary Rajput states had developed traditional enmities against their neighbours. Akbar recognised that if this could be exploited as part of Mughal imperial policy, the expansion of Mughal power could be rendered considerably easier.
  • Superior military material: Individually, the Rajputs were determined fighters — brave, courageous, and renowned for their personal qualities of honesty, chivalry, and loyalty to their leader.
    • This made them a far more dependable force than the foreign levies on whom the Mughals had traditionally relied — levies that were often vain, cruel, and ruthless, showing little loyalty to the sovereign and prone to rebellion.
    • With Rajput support, the problem posed by unreliable foreign levies could be satisfactorily addressed. Thus, in his own self-interest, Akbar considered it essential to secure the support, goodwill, and alliance of the Rajputs, even on their own terms.
  • Foundation for empire-building: Akbar realised that without subduing or conciliating the Rajputs, his vision of empire could not be built on solid foundations.
    • Further, the consolidation of the empire required a political and social synthesis that could not be achieved without Rajput cooperation. This factor could also help him shed the foreign character of his monarchy and transform it into a more national one — winning him popular support and strengthening the rule of his dynasty.
  • Personal temperament and upbringing: It is said that Akbar was born under the roof of a Rajput household, giving him a natural sense of gratitude and affection for the Rajput clan.
    • By nature, he was tolerant, broad-minded, and benevolent — keenly interested in cultivating friendship with Hindus, who incidentally formed the majority of his subjects. Since the Rajputs were predominantly followers of Hinduism, the liberal tendencies of Akbar’s family, along with the influence of his tutors — especially Abdul Latif — made him particularly generous towards them.

The Basis of Conciliation

  • Akbar’s policy always aimed at conciliation, but he was careful not to let it appear born out of weakness. He wanted his overwhelming military superiority to be seen as the true foundation of this policy of conciliation and friendship.
  • Those Rajput states that submitted to his suzerainty were treated generously; those who chose to oppose him were defeated, and their impregnable forts were captured.
    • Even a ruler who submitted after his defeat was treated well — his family honour was respected, and he was allowed to retain his former territory and full autonomy in internal administration, with Akbar guaranteeing complete protection against outside aggression.
    • Where forts were seized and retained for reasons of imperial security, the ruler concerned was given liberal compensation through the grant of jagirs elsewhere.
  • Rajputs were invited to share the burdens of imperial government and the wars of conquest. Those who agreed were given high positions and ranks proportionate to their ability and status, including the highest mansabs and provincial governorships.
    • To perpetuate friendly relations, Akbar persuaded Rajput rulers to accept posts in his civil and military organisation; where a ruler did not wish for such an honour himself, the services of his followers or relations were readily accepted instead.

The Four Pillars of Allegiance

Akbar’s Rajput policy, though rooted in ambition, was far more generous and humane than mere conquest. Through his actions, he demonstrated that he had no wish to annex Rajput states or interfere with their social, religious, or economic life — his sole aim was their allegiance to the proposed imperial confederation. This allegiance rested on four aspects:

  1. The rulers had to pay a fixed tribute as part of their contribution to the empire.
  2. The rulers had to surrender their independent foreign policy and their right to settle disputes through mutual war.
  3. They had to furnish a fixed military quota for imperial service whenever required.
  4. The rulers were to consider themselves an integral part of the empire, and not merely as isolated individual units.

Akbar thus treated the Rajputs on a basis of equality, throwing open all imperial positions to them. Allegiance to the Mughal Empire, in turn, meant peace, order, and prosperity — and it was this promise that ultimately proved decisive. Most Rajput rulers declared their allegiance to the Mughal emperor, even fighting against the great Rajput warrior-hero Rana Pratap Singh of Mewar, whose aim, at best, was regional independence rather than the political unification of Rajputana.

Matrimonial Alliances

  • To bridge the gulf between suzerain and vassal, Akbar sought to establish matrimonial alliances with the Rajputs. The broader objective of such alliances was the Indianization of the Mughals, while for the Rajputs, they conferred the honour and distinction of becoming close relations of the Imperial House.
  • The policy of matrimonial alliance was not, however, an Akbar innovation — it had long been used as a tool of statecraft across the world and through various periods of history. Humayun himself had entered into matrimonial alliances with powerful zamindars and local rajas.
    • When adopted by Akbar as an instrument of policy, it symbolised the dawn of a new era in the Indian political landscape and secured, for the next four generations of Mughal emperors, the services of some of the greatest Rajput stalwarts of medieval India. In this sense, Akbar was following the precedent already set by his father and grandfather.
  • Historiographical debate: According to Dr. R.P. Tripathi, there is no historical evidence that matrimonial alliance was part of a general policy enforced ruthlessly by Akbar, nor that it provoked any great social upsurge or opposition. In fact, there was nothing novel about such relationships, and the Rajputs remained free to enter or decline such alliances.
    • Ishwari Prasad, however, maintains a contrasting view — that these matrimonial alliances were largely one-sided and were frequently the result not of choice, but of necessity.
  • Almost all the Rajput rulers of Rajasthan, with the exception of the ruler of Mewar, submitted to Akbar. Raja Bharmal, the ruler of Amber (modern Jaipur), was the first Rajput ruler to submit to Akbar, in 1562 CE, while Akbar was en route to Ajmer on a pilgrimage to the mausoleum of Khwaja Muinuddin Chishti.
    • Bharmal acknowledged Akbar’s suzerainty and offered his daughter in marriage to the Emperor — this Rajput princess would later give birth to the next Mughal emperor, Jahangir.
    • Akbar also took Bhagwan Das and Man Singh, the adopted son and grandson of Raja Bharmal respectively, into his service.

Evolution of Akbar’s Rajput Policy

Akbar sought both to befriend the Rajputs and, simultaneously, to bring them under his suzerainty. This evolution can be traced through his dealings with Merta, Mewar, Ranthambhor, Kalinjar, and Marwar.

Merta

  • Merta was ruled by Jai Mal, a vassal of Rana Udai Singh of Mewar. It was attacked in 1562 CE by Mirza Sharafuddin, a Mughal officer in Akbar’s service.
  • Jai Mal abandoned the fort, leaving its defence to the Rajputs under the leadership of Dev Das.
  • The Rajputs were ultimately defeated and slaughtered, and the fort fell into Mughal hands in 1562 CE.

Mewar

Mewar was bordered by Jaipur and Ajmer to the north, Pratapgarh and Dungarpur to the south, Kotah and Bundi to the east, and Marwar to the west. It was rich in natural resources, and its people — hardy mountaineers — were widely acclaimed as brave fighters. The ruling family of Mewar, the Sisodias, were the most respected among the Rajput ruling houses of Rajasthan, and the Rana of Mewar was recognised as the acknowledged leader of Rajput chivalry.

  • The power and prestige of Mewar had suffered a setback following the death of Rana Sangram Singh, and the reigning ruler, Rana Udai Singh, was striving to restore Mewar’s lost prestige.

Why Akbar was drawn to Mewar:

  • Mewar was both economically and politically significant. Economically, it commanded the trade route from North India to the sea-ports of Gujarat; politically, Akbar recognised that fulfilling his ambition of conquering Northern India required the capture of the famous fortresses of Chitor and Ranthambhor.
    • The conquest of Mewar was thus part of a larger enterprise — a stepping-stone towards Akbar’s ultimate dream of a united Hindustan.
  • The Rana looked with contempt upon the Raja of Amber for submitting to Akbar and entering into a marriage alliance with him, and himself refused to accept Akbar’s suzerainty.
  • The Rana further offended Akbar by sheltering the fugitive ruler of Malwa, Baz Bahadur, and by aiding the rebellious Mirzas.
  • The Rana’s own second son, Shakti Singh, after offending his father, had joined Mughal service.

The siege of Chitor:

  • The capital city of Chitor occupied a formidable strategic position — situated on a rocky hill some 150 metres above the surrounding plains, encircled by dense forests and deep ravines that made it nearly impossible to scale except from its southern side.
    • The only approach to the fort was via a zigzag road cut through the rock itself, requiring an invader to pass through seven successive gates before reaching the summit.
  • Akbar laid siege to Chitor in 1567 CE. On the advice of his nobles, Rana Udai Singh withdrew into the forests for safety, leaving the defence of the fort to Jai Mal and Fatta (Fateh Singh). The siege continued for more than five months.
    • One night, while supervising repairs to the fort’s ramparts, Jai Mal was seriously wounded by a gunshot fired by Akbar himself.
    • With his fall, the defenders were disheartened; the Rajput women committed jauhar, and the following day, all the Rajputs — including the wounded Jai Mal — fought to the last man and perished on the battlefield.
  • The fierce Rajput resistance under Jai Mal and Fatta so angered Akbar that, upon entering the fort, he ordered a general massacre.
    • He appears to have felt remorse later, paying homage to the fallen leaders by erecting statues of Jai Mal and Fatta mounted on elephants, in full regalia, at the gate of the Agra Fort, to commemorate their heroism.
  • Akbar then left for Ajmer, after appointing Abdul Majid Asaf as Governor of Chitor.

Historiographical note: Colonel Tod described Rana Udai Singh as a weak and cowardly ruler, but modern historians largely reject this view — Udai Singh left the fort only on the advice of his nobles and for the safety of the ruling family, never submitted to Akbar, and endured hardship for the rest of his life.

Rana Pratap and the Battle of Haldighati:

  • Although the Mughals captured Chitor and its capital, a considerable part of Mewar’s territory remained under Rana Udai Singh’s control. Udai Singh died in 1572 CE and was succeeded by his son, Rana Pratap Singh, who vowed to recapture both his capital and its fort.
  • When all attempts by Akbar to secure his submission failed, he deputed Man Singh and Asaf Khan to attack Mewar in 1576 CE.
  • Rana Pratap confronted them in the famous Battle of Haldighati on 18 June 1576 CE. Though vastly outnumbered, the Rana’s forces attacked with such fury that the Mughal army was, at one point, driven to desperation.
    • As the Rana came under heavy pressure from all sides, one of his nobles, Bida Jhala, seized the Rana’s crown and wore it himself. The Mughals, mistaking Jhala for the Rana, surrounded him, allowing Rana Pratap the chance to escape the battlefield.
    • Though the Rajputs were defeated, the Mughal forces were themselves too exhausted to pursue the escaping Rana. Gogunda was occupied by the Mughals, but no further gains were made.
    • Both Man Singh and Asaf Khan opposed any indiscriminate plundering of the Rana’s territory and were recalled following their initial success. Other Mughal officers sent in pursuit of the Rana also failed to capture him, though the whole of Mewar was ravaged in the process.
  • Forced to take shelter in the hills, Rana Pratap never lost his spirit of resistance and never accepted Akbar’s suzerainty. Before his death in 1597 CE, he had succeeded in recovering a large part of Mewar from Mughal control. His struggle against Akbar is regarded as a glorious chapter in Indian history.

Ranthambhor

  • The ruler of Ranthambhor, Raja Surjan Rai, was a Rajput of Bundi and a vassal of Mewar. Akbar’s army marched against his forces, attacking the fort of Ranthambhor in 1569 CE. After a siege lasting one and a half months, the Raja surrendered.
  • He accepted Akbar’s suzerainty and entered imperial service, later being appointed Governor of Benares province and of the fort of Chunar.

Kalinjar

  • Kalinjar was ruled by Raja Ram Chand of Rewa. Akbar dispatched his army against Kalinjar in August 1569 CE.
  • Having already learnt of the fall of Chitor and Ranthambhor, the Raja surrendered without offering any resistance.

Marwar

  • The successive surrenders of Chitor and Ranthambhor thoroughly demoralised the remaining Rajput rulers, and Akbar’s conciliatory policy made it easier for them to accept his suzerainty — he encountered no further resistance from other rulers.
  • In 1570 CE, the rulers of Jodhpur, Bikaner, and Jaisalmer accepted Akbar’s suzerainty. By this year, with the exception of Mewar and a few of its tributary states, the whole of Rajasthan had submitted to Akbar, marking the completion of his success against the Rajputs.

Three Types of Rajput Response

Akbar’s dealings with the Rajputs revealed three distinct patterns of response:

  1. Those, like the ruler of Amber, who readily submitted to the Mughal ruler and were smoothly assimilated into the imperial system.
  2. Those who put up a respectable fight before reaching an honourable settlement with the conqueror, such as Ranthambhor.
  3. Those who refused assimilation altogether and sought refuge in flight or persistent resistance, exemplified by the Rana of Mewar.

The first two categories, through their very submission, displayed a spirit of compromise and assimilation essential to building the united nation towards which Akbar directed the full might of his genius. The last, through its unyielding pride, eternal defiance, and indomitable courage, contributed its own distinct quota to the strength and nobility of the national character.

Results of Akbar’s Rajput Policy

Akbar’s Rajput policy has been praised by most contemporary and later historians. Its principal critics have been Badauni, in the earlier period, and Qureshi among modern historians — both of whom condemn the policy and hold it responsible for hastening the eventual collapse of Mughal rule in India. These criticisms, however, are generally regarded as biased.

  • The policy proved beneficial to both the Mughal Empire and the Rajputs for well over a century. Rajput friendship and cooperation lent the necessary security and permanence to Mughal rule, while their active participation in governmental affairs contributed significantly to economic prosperity and to a cultural renaissance that helped forge a synthesis of Hindu and Muslim cultures.
  • For the Rajputs, the policy brought peace to their homeland. They continued to enjoy internal autonomy, retained the freedom to practise their religion and celebrate their festivals, continued to follow their traditional laws, and were assured of their hereditary claims to their principalities.

Viewed in light of these mutual benefits, Akbar’s Rajput policy may be judged an overall success.

Summary

  • Akbar was the first Mughal emperor to pursue a planned policy towards the Rajputs, shaped by a combination of political, strategic, and personal factors.
  • He was deeply impressed by the chivalry, faithfulness, daring, and fighting skill of the Rajputs, and realised that his imperial ambitions could not be secured without their cooperation.
  • The consolidation of the empire required a political and social synthesis achievable only through Rajput support — a goal reinforced by the liberal tendencies of Akbar’s family and the influence of tutors like Abdul Latif.
  • Rajput states that submitted were treated generously and allowed to retain their territories; those that resisted faced conquest, though even a defeated ruler was later treated with honour.
  • Rajputs were drawn into the imperial administration and military, given high ranks proportionate to their ability, and most Rajput rulers ultimately declared allegiance to the Mughal throne.
  • Akbar pursued matrimonial alliances with the Rajputs to bridge the gulf between suzerain and vassal, aiming at the Indianization of the Mughal dynasty.
  • Raja Bharmal of Amber became the first Rajput ruler to accept Akbar’s suzerainty, offering his daughter in marriage in 1562 CE; that same year, Akbar captured Merta.
  • Rana Pratap of Mewar refused to submit; Akbar besieged Chitor in 1567 CE, and fought the Rana at the Battle of Haldighati on 18 June 1576 CE, where Rana Pratap was defeated but escaped and never accepted Mughal suzerainty.
  • Ranthambhor (Raja Surjan Rai) and Kalinjar (Raja Ram Chand) fell to Akbar’s forces in 1569 CE, and by 1570 CE, the rulers of Jodhpur, Bikaner, and Jaisalmer had accepted his suzerainty.
  • Overall, the Rajput Policy of Akbar is regarded as a grand success, laying the foundation for over a century of stable Mughal rule.

History Optional Courses

guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted