Ecology and Environmental Policy in Post-Colonial India

History Optional Notes {PDF}

Complete Notes Package (Paper I & II) | 4500+ Pages | Instant Download

India’s environmental policy in the post-colonial period evolved gradually — from a near-total absence of dedicated environmental law in the early years of Independence, through the watershed influence of the 1972 Stockholm Conference, to a comprehensive body of legislation, institutions, and policy statements by the turn of the century. This evolution ran alongside a parallel history of grassroots environmental movements — from Chipko to Narmada Bachao Andolan — that shaped public consciousness and pushed the state toward stronger environmental governance. This article traces this dual history of ecology and environmental policy in post-colonial India, a key theme in the UPSC History Optional syllabus on post-Independence India.

Independence to the Stockholm Conference (1947–1972)

In the early years of Independence, there was no precise environmental policy, and few attempts were made to frame any specific policy or law for the protection of the environment.
- This period placed greater stress on the development of infrastructure, with little concern for environmental issues.
- Environmental concerns such as sewage disposal, sanitation, and public health were handled by different ministries of government. However, concern for environmental protection was reflected, to some extent, in the national planning process and in forest policy.
During this period, legislation existed to control the felling of trees, the destruction of forests, unplanned town growth, and water pollution. The following Acts were in place:

Key Legislation of the Pre-Stockholm Period

The Factories Act, 1948:
- Required all factories to make effective arrangements for waste disposal, and empowered State Governments to frame rules implementing this directive.
- Provided that liquid effluents, gases, and fumes generated during a manufacturing process should be treated before final disposal, to minimise adverse effects.
The River Boards Act, 1956: Established river boards empowered to prevent water pollution of inter-state rivers.
The Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957.
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960: Framed to prevent cruelty to animals.
Thus, scattered provisions existed for checking pollution of air, water, and so on, but there was no unified effort in developing a coherent policy addressing these areas — a position that persisted up to the 1970s.
Meanwhile, concern grew over population increase, rising pollution levels, human impact on animal populations and natural landscapes, and other aspects of resource depletion.
It was the Stockholm Declaration of 1972 that turned the attention of the Indian government to the broader perspective of environmental protection — a shift the government made known both through subsequent Five Year Plans and through the legislation enacted to curb and control environmental pollution.

Post-Stockholm Conference Period (After 1972)

The Stockholm Conference on Environment and Development had a considerable influence on environmental policymaking, leading to a constitutional amendment, followed by important legislation such as the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, as well as the creation of institutions like the Central and State Pollution Control Boards to implement these Acts.

Environmental Laws Since 1972

The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972:
- Enacted to prevent the decline of wild animals and birds; it prohibits the poaching of certain animals except for education or scientific research.
- Under this Act, a state government may declare any area a sanctuary or national park if it considers the area to be of adequate ecological, faunal, floral, geomorphological, natural, or zoological significance for protecting, propagating, or developing wildlife or its environment.
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974: Paved the way for the creation of the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) to act as watchdogs for the prevention and control of pollution.
The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980: Aimed at checking deforestation and the diversion of forest land for non-forestry purposes, and at promoting social forestry.
The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981: Aimed at checking air pollution through pollution control boards.
The Bhopal gas tragedy of 1984 had a deep impact on the minds of policymakers, spurring the delivery of comprehensive environmental legislation in 1986.
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: A landmark law providing a single focus in the country for the protection of the environment, aimed at plugging loopholes in existing legislation. It provides mainly for pollution control, with stringent penalties for violations.
The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991: Provides for mandatory insurance to give immediate relief to persons affected by accidents occurring while handling hazardous substances.
The National Environment Tribunals Act, 1995: Formulated in view of the fact that civil court litigation takes a long time — as happened in the Bhopal case — the Act provides for the speedy disposal of environment-related cases through environmental tribunals. Under this Act, four benches of the tribunal were set up in Delhi, Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay.
The National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997: Provided for the establishment of a National Environment Appellate Authority (NEAA) to hear appeals regarding restrictions on areas in which industries, operations, or processes shall not be carried out, or shall be carried out only subject to certain safeguards, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002: A major legislative intervention undertaken in the name of the communities involved in protecting the biodiversity around them; it intends to facilitate access to genetic materials while protecting the traditional knowledge associated with them.

(Additional environmental legislation covered under the General Studies syllabus may also be added here.)

Environmental Policy Since 1972

By early 1972, it had been realised that unless a national body was established to bring greater coherence and coordination to environmental policies and programmes, and to integrate environmental concerns into economic development plans, an important gap would remain in India’s planning process.
- Thus, in February 1972, the National Committee on Environmental Planning and Coordination (NCEPC) was established within the Department of Science and Technology, serving as the apex advisory body on all matters pertaining to environmental protection and improvement.
- The committee was assisted by the Department of Science and Technology, and an Office of Environmental Planning and Co-ordination (OEPC) was set up under the direction of the committee’s chairman.
- The committee was responsible for planning and coordination, while the responsibility for execution remained with the various ministries and governmental agencies.
- Over time, the composition of the committee changed significantly, making it unwieldy and decision-making more complex, with greater bureaucratisation occurring as more secretaries were added.
The National Council for Environmental Planning and Policy was set up in 1972, later evolving into the Ministry of Environment and Forests in 1985.

Environment in the Five Year Plans

Fourth Five Year Plan (1969–74): For the first time, the importance of preserving the quality of life and promoting the environment alongside development was stressed, in a chapter on the long-term perspective.
- However, it was only during the Fifth (1974–79) and Sixth (1980–85) Plans that the concerns expressed in the Fourth Plan were translated into concrete action through several initiated programmes.
Fifth Five Year Plan (1974–79):
- Stressed the need for close association between the NCEPC and all major industrial decisions, so that environmental goals were fully taken into account.
- Emphasised that the pursuit of development should not come at the cost of quality of life, strongly linking developmental planning with environmental management.
- The Minimum Needs Programme (covering rural education, health, nutrition, drinking water, etc.) received fairly high priority, and was expected to minimise environmental pollution and degradation in rural areas.
Sixth Five Year Plan (1980–85):
- Included an entire chapter on “Environment and Development,” emphasising sound environmental and ecological principles in land use, agriculture, forestry, wildlife, water, air, the marine environment, minerals, fisheries, renewable energy sources, energy, and human settlements.
- Provided guidance on environmental concerns to administrators and resource managers in formulating and implementing programmes, and laid down an institutional structure for environmental management in the Central and State Governments.
Seventh Five Year Plan (1985–90):
- Emphasised sustainable development in harmony with the environment, as the federal government had come to recognise the negative effects of development programmes on the environment.
- Called for government and voluntary agencies to work together to create environmental awareness, recognising that planning for economic growth and social well-being in each sector must also secure improvement in environmental quality.
- The country’s leaders had come to realise that poverty and under-development, as much as development activity itself, had contributed to many of the country’s environmental problems.
Eighth Five Year Plan (1992–97): Gave environment an important place by moving it to the fourth category of subjects examined in the Plan document, stating: “Systematic efforts have been made since the Sixth Plan period to integrate environmental considerations and imperatives in the planning process in all the key socio-economic sectors. As a result of sustained endeavour, planning in all major sectors like industry, science and technology, agriculture, energy and education include environmental considerations.”
Ninth Five Year Plan (1997–2002): Emphasised “Growth with Social Justice and Equity,” with special emphasis on Joint Forest Management and Community Forestry.
Tenth Plan (2002–2007 and beyond): Continued along similar lines.

Tiwari Committee (1980)

The Government of India set up a committee in January 1980, under the chairmanship of Shri N.D. Tiwari, then Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, to review existing environmental legislation and recommend legislative measures and administrative machinery for environmental protection.
- The committee stressed the need for the proper management of the country’s natural resources of land, forest, and water, in order to conserve the nation’s ecological base.

The 1990s: New Economic Policy and Environmental Governance

The New Economic Policy, initiated in 1991, led to constitutional amendments in 1994 facilitating the decentralisation of powers and resources to local bodies. This period also witnessed:
- The Policy Statement for Abatement of Pollution and the National Conservation Strategy and Policy Statement on Environment and Development, both brought out by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) in 1992.
- The Environmental Action Programme (EAP), formulated in 1993, with the objective of improving environmental services and integrating environmental considerations into development programmes.

National Environment Policy, 2006

The National Conservation Strategy and Policy Statement on Environment and Development, 1992 was one of the Government of India’s first attempts to develop a policy framework for environmental protection. The National Forest Policy, 1988 and the Policy Statement for Abatement of Pollution, 1992 were other policy frameworks advocating effective environmental management at the national level.
A need was felt, however, to bring together the guiding principles of all these documents into a single comprehensive national environmental policy. Consequently, the National Environment Policy was approved by the Union Cabinet on 18 May 2006.
- The National Environment Policy, 2006 (NEP 2006) does not displace earlier policies, but builds upon them.

Objectives of the National Environment Policy, 2006:

Conservation of critical environmental resources
Intra-generational equity: livelihood security for the poor
Inter-generational equity
Integration of environmental concerns in economic and social development, with efficiency in environmental resource use
Environmental governance
Enhancement of resources for environmental conservation

Constitutional Provisions

The Constitution of India provides a number of Directive Principles of State Policy. Until 1976, environmental protection did not appear anywhere in the Constitution; however, the 42nd Amendment of 1976 introduced specific environmental provisions.
- Article 48A was added to the Directive Principles of State Policy, stating: “The state shall endeavor to protect and improve the natural environment and safeguard the forests and wildlife in the country.”
- Article 51A(g) of the Fundamental Duties states: “It shall be the duty of every citizen in India to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures.”
- With this amendment, “Forests” and “Wildlife” were moved from the State List to the Concurrent List.

Environmental Movements in Independent India

A large number of environmental movements have emerged in India, especially after the 1970s. These movements grew out of a series of independent responses to local issues in different places at different times.

Major reasons for the emergence of environmental movements in India include:

Control over natural resources
Misguided developmental policies of the government
Socio-economic reasons
Environmental degradation and destruction
The spread of environmental awareness and media coverage

These movements have emerged from the Himalayan regions of Uttar Pradesh to the tropical forests of Kerala, and from Gujarat to Tripura.

Major Movements

Bishnoi Movement (1730)

Led by Amrita Devi, this movement saw around 363 people sacrifice their lives for the protection of their forests.
- It was the first movement of its kind to spontaneously develop the strategy of hugging or embracing trees for their protection.

The Chipko Movement

The Chipko movement takes its name from the actions of women in Uttarakhand in the 1970s, who hugged trees to prevent them from being cut down by timber contractors.
- Chipko, meaning “hugging,” describes how local village women literally “hugged” trees, interposing their bodies between the trees and the loggers to prevent their felling.
- It was an ecological movement, concerned with the preservation of forests and, thereby, with maintaining the traditional ecological balance of the sub-Himalayan region, where hill communities have traditionally enjoyed a positive relationship with their environment.
- The movement holds an important place in Indian history as one of the first and foremost movements on environmental concern, later imitated in many other regions of the country.
- It focused world attention on the environmental problems of the Alaknanda catchment area in the mid-Western Himalayas. The main demand of the protesters was that the benefits of the forest — especially the right to fodder — should go to local people, and villagers hugged, embraced, or clung to trees to prevent them from being felled by contractors.
Both female and male activists played pivotal roles in the movement, including Gaura Devi, Sudesha Devi, Bachni Devi, Chandi Prasad Bhatt, Sundarlal Bahuguna, Govind Singh Rawat, Dhoom Singh Negi, Shamsher Singh Bisht, and Ghanshyam Raturi, the Chipko poet.
- Local inhabitants — especially women — took the lead, standing before the giant timber mafia to prevent tree-felling. While many pioneers, such as Chandi Prasad Bhatt and Sundarlal Bahuguna, were men, women formed the backbone of the movement, including Gaura Devi, Sudesha Devi, and Bachni Devi.
- The slow degradation of the hilly region — and the resulting water shortages, landslides, and shortages of fodder and firewood — affected women directly, since they were solely in charge of cultivation, livestock, and children, and would be the first to bear the brunt of any environmental disaster. They believed in the traditional equilibrium between humans and forests, which needed to be nurtured.
- By cutting the trees, women were the most affected, as it meant travelling further to collect fuel, food, fodder, and water. Able to perceive the link between their own victimisation and the denuding of mountain slopes by commercial interests, sheer survival made women support the movement.
- With constant pressure and the movement gathering momentum, the then Prime Minister banned tree-felling in the region for 15 years.
- Adopting these radical but peaceful methods, women took up leadership positions and forced their way into decision-making, in a heavily patriarchal society; over time, they became aware of their potential as soldiers of the movement and went on to enhance their roles.

Narmada Bachao Andolan

A movement against the Narmada River Valley Project (main person involved: Medha Patkar).
- It drew upon a multiplicity of discourses for its protests, including: displacement risks and resettlement provisions; environmental impact and sustainability issues; the financial implications of the project; forceful evictions and violations of civil liberties; issues pertaining to river valley planning and management; the implications of the Western growth model; and alternative development and appropriate technology, among others.

Appiko Movement

One of India’s forest-based environmental movements, which took place in the Uttara Kannada district of Karnataka, in the Western Ghats.
- It succeeded in its three-fold objectives: protecting the existing forest cover, regenerating trees on denuded land, and utilising forest wealth with proper consideration for the conservation of natural resources.
- The movement saved basic life sources for local people — trees such as bamboo, useful for making handicrafts that could be sold for income, as well as medicinal trees for local use.
- It created awareness among villagers throughout the Western Ghats about the ecological dangers posed by commercial and industrial interests to their forests, which formed their main source of sustenance.

Silent Valley Movement

The central issues of the Silent Valley protests were the protection of the tropical rainforest and the maintenance of ecological balance against a proposed hydroelectric project.
- The protest opposed the destruction of forest and ecologically unsustainable development, above all seeking to maintain ecological balance.
- Campaigns and petitions were the main strategies adopted by activists in the movement, based on a non-violent, Gandhian ideological orientation.

Tehri Dam Conflict

One of the most protracted environmental movements in recent years has been the movement against the Tehri Dam.
- The 260.5-metre-high Tehri Dam on the Bhagirathi in the Garhwal Himalayas was opposed by local people.

Nature of Environmental Movements in India

These movements have mainly been characterised by peaceful, mass-based protest against environmental degradation — such as hugging trees in the Chipko movement, or the Gandhian approach of satyagraha.
They have concerned matters of livelihood and survival rather than luxury, unlike in Western countries.
They have sometimes involved leaders from outside the affected community, such as Medha Patkar.
They have made use of constitutional means, such as petitions to courts, as seen in the Narmada Bachao Andolan and the Silent Valley movement.
The most significant feature of environmental movements in India is the involvement of local voluntary organisations or Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs).
- For example, the Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad (KSSP), an NGO, worked for three decades among the masses of Kerala to spread environmental awareness, popularising science and appropriate technology, and campaigning against environmentally destructive development projects.
These movements are an expression of the socio-ecological effects of narrowly conceived development, based on short-term criteria of exploitation.
Environmental movements have also seen active women’s participation. Movements like Chipko brought home the understanding that environmental issues are often women’s issues, since women suffer the most from environmental deterioration.
- The reasons for women’s participation lie in the dependence of women, within contemporary Indian society, upon trees: society required women to arrange firewood, fodder, and water, making them heavily dependent on trees for these functions.
- Trees provided the necessary fuel and fodder directly, apart from contributing to food supply, while water requirements were met through nearby ponds or rivers that remained relatively clean because trees checked soil erosion and, consequently, the silting of rivers, ponds, and lakes.
These movements, though localised and arising from immediate grievances, had wide national appeal, but could not be channelled into a single nationwide movement — each movement typically started, achieved its aim (or not), and fizzled out.
They nevertheless brought the concern for sustainable development to the fore. As a consequence, major legislation was passed, including the Environment (Protection) Act (1986), the Wild Life (Protection) Act (1972), and the Forest (Conservation) Act (1980), along with water and air pollution Acts.
- In 1974, the Central Pollution Control Board and its state counterparts were constituted.
India is a signatory to a number of international protocols, including the Cartagena Protocol, the Nagoya Protocol, the Montreal Protocol, and the Kigali Protocol.
The protection and improvement of the environment (Article 48) is one among many directives to be followed by the state under Part IV of the Constitution.
The right to a safe environment has been read into the right to life under Article 21, and the Clean India (Swachh Bharat) campaign has proved a landmark in government efforts towards environmental protection.