Crop Combination & Crop Combination Regions in India

  • A crop combination is the group of crops grown in an area at a given point of time.
  • Its study is the analysis of the percentage of acreage held by each crop in a region during an agricultural year.
  • Crops are generally grown together, and a crop rarely stands in total isolation. Only small pockets of plantation farming come close to this.
  • Such groupings stay fairly stable, because the ecological and socio-economic conditions behind them change slowly.

Crop Combination

Why the Study Matters

  • It is an important part of agricultural study:
    • It gives a sound basis for agricultural regionalisation.
    • It helps to frame a strategy for agricultural development, and has real value for rural planning.
  • Maps of single crops show the density and concentration of each crop, but the integrated assemblage of crops in a region tells more.
    • Calling part of India a rice region or a wheat region hides a basic fact: such regions very often also grow mustard, gram, pulses and maize.
    • The 100 cm isohyet broadly parts rice from wheat, yet other food and commercial crops on both sides cannot be ignored.
  • John C. Weaver (1954) saw three uses for combination analysis:
    • It is needed to understand the geography of crops, livestock and enterprises that hold varying ranks in a combination.
    • Each combination is a composite reality, and this steers any analysis of distribution.
    • They are building blocks for still more complex agricultural regions.

Calculation of Crop Combination

  • A clear view of a region’s agricultural mosaic needs a systematic study of its combinations, which has great planning value.
  • The methods fall into two categories:
    • The arbitrary choice method
    • The statistical method
BasisArbitrary choiceStatistical (Weaver)
Crops includedThe first two or three onlyDecided by the minimum deviation
ObjectivitySubjectiveObjective and repeatable
EffortSimple, hence still widely usedLaborious calculation
Chief weaknessIgnores the area and value of excluded cropsUnwieldy where crops are highly diverse

The Arbitrary Choice Method

  • Only the two or three leading crops of an area enter the combination, and the others are dropped, with no regard to their percentage of area or their monetary value. This makes it unscientific.
  • Its other limitations:
    • The result can repeat itself when combinations are presented and analysed.
    • It lacks sensitivity, since subjective choice tends to override objective analysis.
    • The number of combinations climbs with the number of crops, which complicates the exercise.
    • The crops kept may together hold under half of the area, with many lesser crops left out, and this misleads.
  • At the macro level, it can still separate broad rice and wheat zones, and micro regions can then be marked by other crops that matter locally.

The Statistical Method

  • Being based on a statistical formula, this method is more scientific and reliable for grouping crops objectively. It also handles strong crop diversity better.
  • John C. Weaver (1954) was the first in agricultural geography to use statistical techniques to demarcate crop combination regions, in the Middle West of the USA.
    • His analysis rested on acreage statistics.
    • He worked out the percentage of total harvested cropland held by every crop with at least one per cent of the cultivated land, in each of 1,081 counties.
    • He wanted a procedure that was objective, constant and precisely repeatable, so that years and places could be compared.
  • He compared the real percentages of crops, for all possible combinations in each areal unit, against a theoretical curve:
  • The curve continues in the same way for other sizes: 6 crops 16.67% each, 7 crops 14.29%, 8 crops 12.5% and 9 crops 11.11%.
  • He found the minimum deviation through the standard deviation:
  • Here d is the gap between a crop’s actual percentage in a county (areal unit) and its value on the theoretical curve. n counts the crops in that combination.
  • Weaver noted that relative, and not absolute, value matters, so he did not extract square roots. The formula actually used is the variance:
  • In this box, the left-hand side stands for the variance, with d inside the sum keeping the meaning given above.
Worked Example: Gorakhpur
  • Yearly shares of harvested area: rice 48%, wheat 23%, barley 15%, sugarcane 6% and pulses 5%.
Table of the crop combination worked example for Gorakhpur, with the calculation and value for each combination: monoculture 2,704, two crops 366.5, three crops 219.0 (the lowest), four crops 248.5 and five crops 247.8.
CombinationVariance
Monoculture2,704
2 crops366.5
3 crops219.0, the lowest
4 crops248.5
5 crops247.8
  • The deviation from the theoretical curve is lowest for a three-crop combination. Gorakhpur’s basic combination is therefore rice, wheat and barley.
Weaver’s Method Applied to India
  • Applied at district level to the data of 2003-06, the technique gives eight-crop combinations for India.
  • The pattern that emerges:
    • Monoculture of rice: lower Brahmaputra valley, West Bengal, Odisha and coastal Andhra Pradesh.
    • Bajra dominant: western Rajasthan.
    • Rice and wheat: Punjab and Haryana.
    • Wheat, rice and sugarcane: western Uttar Pradesh.
    • Four to eight crops: the rest of the country, where wheat, rice, maize, gram, barley, ragi, pulses, oilseeds, cotton, sugarcane, bajra and millets form different associations.
Evaluation of Weaver’s Method
  • It has been widely accepted and applied, since it gives a suitable and accurate grouping of crops.
  • Its weaknesses:
    • It gives unwieldy combinations for units with high crop diversity.
    • It involves laborious calculations.
    • A crop may occupy little land and yet matter greatly to a region. Weaver handled such a crop by printing its name on the finished map.
    • By his own admission, the lowest deviation may sometimes include a crop with as little as one per cent of the cropland.

Modifications of Weaver’s Method

WorkerChange made
Doi (1959)Replaced the variance with the sum of squared deviations, which simplified the work
Peter ScottTreated animals as equal in importance to crops in Tasmania
Thomas (1963)Brought in data for all crops of a unit when calculating the variance
John Terence Coppock (1964)Converted farm animals to common food units and used the method of least squares
  • Rafiullah (1956) proposed a separate maximum positive deviation method.
  • In India, Jasbir Singh (1971) and Singh and Dhillon (1984) made notable contributions.
  • Most Indian studies now rest on old data and often cover only crop groups, so a fresh analysis would be useful.

Crop Combination Regions in India

  • The method of least squares used by John Terence Coppock in 1964 has been employed to work out India’s crop combination regions.
  • Eleven first-ranking crops hold areas large enough to merit separate treatment: rice, wheat, jowar, maize, bajra, ragi, gram, pulses, sugarcane, cotton and oilseeds.
    • Another application lists barley, groundnut and tea in place of gram, sugarcane and oilseeds, and recognises 38 combinations.
  • First-ranking crops are those with the highest percentage of the cropped area in a component areal unit.
  • India is thus divided into 11 crop zones or regions of the first order. These are further divided into dominant crop combination regions, to bring out land use in the transitional areas more meaningfully.
Map of India showing crop combination regions for 2005-06, with letter codes such as WR, RWMP, BOM, MPWO and CJ, and jhuming tracts in the north-east.
  • This map uses the data of 2005-06. Letters give the crops, so that RWMP stands for rice, wheat, maize and pulses, and NA marks units without data.

Generalised Regions by First-Ranking Crop

First-ranking cropMain areasCrops in combination
RiceChhattisgarh, Chotanagpur, West Bengal, Krishna, Godavari and Cauvery deltas, coastal Odisha, Brahmaputra valley, Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland, Andaman and Nicobar Islands (near monoculture)Few
RiceWest coast: Malabar and KonkanRubber, coconut, ragi, vegetables, fodder
RiceNon-deltaic east coast: Tamil Nadu, Andhra PradeshGroundnut, bajra, jowar, maize
RiceMiddle Ganga valley: eastern Uttar Pradesh, BiharWheat, pulses, sugarcane, barley, maize
RiceSouth Karnataka plateauCoffee, ragi, pulses, cardamom, coconut, citrus
RiceJalpaiguri; Meghalaya plateauMaize; potato, maize, cotton
WheatGanga-Yamuna doab, eastern Haryana, Punjab and its foothillsRice, maize, sugarcane, bajra, pulses, fodder
JowarSalem-Coimbatore highland, north Karnataka, western and northern Maharashtra, TelanganaBajra, groundnut, pulses, cotton, rice
MaizeSouth-east Rajasthan with adjoining Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat; hills of Himachal Pradesh and KashmirWheat, rice, groundnut, gram, fodder
BajraRajasthan, Kachchh, parts of Uttar Pradesh and HaryanaWheat, fodder, pulses
RagiSouth Karnataka, DharmapuriRice, pulses, groundnut, jowar, coconut
BarleyLahaul-Spiti, KinnaurWheat and hill grains
CottonEastern and northern Maharashtra, eastern Gujarat, parts of Madhya PradeshJowar, bajra, groundnut, fodder
GroundnutAnantapur, Kadapa and Chittoor; KathiawarJowar, bajra, dry crops
TeaDarjeeling (near monoculture); NilgiriCoffee and vegetables in the Nilgiri
PulsesUplands south of the Ganga, north-eastern Rajasthan, parts of Odisha, Telangana, Andhra PradeshVaries
  • Nowhere in India is wheat a true monoculture. Districts with over 40% of the cropped area under wheat are called wheat regions.

Factors Affecting Crop Combinations

  • Three or four crops make up the usual combination, though seven-crop combinations are also common.
  • The main factors are physiography, soil fertility, rainfall, weather, irrigation and the farmer’s priorities.
  • Irrigation has changed combinations widely in arid and semi-arid tracts.
  • Extremes reduce the choice: very dry, very wet, very cold or very hot conditions limit the number of crops.
  • Diversity is highest where annual rainfall is about 30–100 cm, and it is also large in the Himalayan hills.
  • Combinations form part of the wider study of the cropping pattern of India and feed into agricultural regionalisation.

Previous Year Questions

Geography Optional Courses

guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
MUZZAMIL KHAN

Thankyou very much 🙂

This is precise and we’ll organised.

Sonu kumar

Calculation of sd in monoculture is not correct, it’ll be 2704

Last edited 4 years ago by Sonu kumar
aastik

there are 23regions according to singh and dhillon based on weaver and cappock scheme

Dinesh Kumar

Thanks