Q. Regarding the taxation system of Krishna Deva, the ruler of Vijayanagar, consider the following statements:
- The tax rate on land was fixed depending on the quality of the land.
- Private owners of workshops paid an industries tax.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- 1 only
- 2 only
- Both 1 and 2
- Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Notes:
- Vijayanagara rulers followed an oppressive taxation policy.
- The prosperity of the empire can be explained through their taxation principles.
- The land tax was the major source of revenue during the period of the Vijayanagar kingdom.
- During the reign of Krishna Devaraya the rate was fixed between one third and one-sixth depending on the quality of the land.
- Besides land tax, there were also taxes imposed on shopkeepers, farm servants, workmen, posters, shoemakers, musicians etc.
- Grazing and house taxes were also imposed.
- Commercial taxes consisting of levies, duties and customs on manufactured articles of trade were also levied.
- Private owners of workshops also paid an industry tax.
Land and income rights:
- Rice was the staple crop. Both black and white variety of rice, gram and pulses, spices (specially black pepper) coconut and betel-nuts were important items of production.
- Land-revenue was the major source of state’s income:
- Rate of revenue demand varied in different parts of the empire and in the same locality itself according to the fertility and regional location of the land.
- It was generally 1/6th of the produce, but in some cases it was even more ranging up to 1/4th.
- But on Brahmans and temples it was 1/20th to 1/30th respectively.
- According to an inscription, the rates of taxes were as follows:
- One-third of the produce of kuruvai (a type of rice) during winter.
- One-fourth of seasame, ragi, horsegram, etc.
- One-sixth of millet and other crops cultivated on dry land.
- Thus, the rate varied according to the type of crops, soil, method of irrigation, etc.
- It was payable both in cash and kind.
- We find references to three major categories of land tenure which indicate the way in which the village income was distributed.
- Bhandaravada:
- The bhandarvada was a crown village comprising the smallest category.
- A part of its income was utilised to maintain the Vijaynagar forts.
- Manya.
- Income from the manya (tax-free) villages was used to maintain the Brahmans, temples, and mathas.
- The manya rights underwent a transformation during this period.
- Land tenures continued to be given by the state to individual (ekabhogan) Brahmans and groups of Brahmans as well as to mathas including the non- Brahman Saiva Siddhanta and Vaishnava gurus.
- But there was a great increase in devadana grants (conferred on temples) made by the state as compared to other grants.
- Amara:
- The largest category was of the amara villages given by the Vijaynagar rulers to the amaranayakas.
- Their holders did not possess proprietary rights in land but enjoyed -privileges over its income only.
- The amara tenure was primarily residual in the sense that its income was distributed after deductions had been made for support of the Brahmans and forts.
- Three-quarters of all the villages came under this category.
- The term amaramakni is considered by most historians as referring to an ‘estate’ or a ‘fief, but it literally means one-sixteenth share (makani). Thus, it points to the fact that the amaranayakas could claim only a limited share of village income.
- Bhandaravada:
- Other taxes:
- Besides land-tax, many professional taxes also were imposed. These were on shopkeepers, farm-servants, shepherds, washermen, potters, shoemakers, musicians etc.
- There was also tax on property, grazing and house taxes were also imposed.
- Villagers were also supposed to pay for the maintenance of the village officers.
- Sthala dayam, mara dayam and manula dayam were three major transit dues.
- Other taxes:
- tax on sale of produce,
- military contribution (in times of distress),
- tax on marriage, etc.
- Another category of land right through which income was derived was a result of investment in irrigation. It was called dasavanda in Tamil country; and Kathu-Kodage in Andhra and Karnataka.
- As village self-rule declined, there was the growth of a class of locally powerful people who used their position for developing agriculture by providing additional irrigation facilities for which an extra charge was made.
- Many temples, which enjoyed rent-free villages, also used their resources for this purpose.
- Usually undertaken in semi-dry areas where hydrographic and topographic features were conducive for carrying out developmental projects.
- The dasavanda or Kattu-Kodage was a share in the increased productivity of the land earned by the person who undertake such developmental work.
- A portion of income accruing from the increased productivity also went to the cultivators of the village where the developmental work was undertaken.
- This right to income was personal and transferable.
- As village self-rule declined, there was the growth of a class of locally powerful people who used their position for developing agriculture by providing additional irrigation facilities for which an extra charge was made.
